Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Zizou Bergs vs Tennys Sandgren Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bergs vs Sandgren analysis and find out who is favored!
Zizou Bergs vs Tennys Sandgren Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bergs has won 50.95% of points on his second serve, while Sandgren has won 50.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bergs, in recent form, has won 50.49% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sandgren has won 48.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.71% and 27.82% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bergs has saved 61.32% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sandgren has saved 65.18% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bergs has won 64.79% of matches played (W/L 46/ 25), with Sandgren winning 53.45% (W/L 31/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bergs has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 72% (W/L 13/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 80/ 51). Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 241/ 175), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Bergs has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 30/ 10), where as Sandgren has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56% of matches (W/L 28/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bergs winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Bergs winning 2 and Sandgren winning 1. The last match between Bergs and Sandgren was at the Sarasota Challenger, 13-04-2024, Semifinals, Clay with Zizou Bergs getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:35:16.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bergs and Sandgren have played a deciding set 1 times, with Bergs winning 1 times and Sandgren 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bergs winning 0, and Sandgren 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bergs has played against opponents with an average rank of 270.07 while Sandgren has played against players with an average rank of 286.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bergs has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sandgren has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bergs has converted 38.68% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sandgren has converted 32.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bergs 1 - 0 Sandgren
108
Rank
103
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
253
Rank
41
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
62% (279-168)
Career Total W/L
56% (421-325)
65% (22-12)
YTD W/L
59% (13-9)
$313,835
Career Prize Money
$2,256,263
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Zizou Bergs | Tennys Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:35:16 | 2:35:16 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (43/76) | 43% (52/120) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (34/43) | 73% (38/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (17/33) | 43% (29/68) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 24% (4/17) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (53/120) | 33% (25/76) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Zizou Bergs | Tennys Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (22/12) | 59% (13/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (52/32) | 62% (34/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (422/378) | 53% (292/260) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (12/4) | 63% (5/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (7/4) | 67% (4/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.65 | 0.86 |
| Aces Total | 255 | 232 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 103 | 61 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:1 | 1:55:31 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 303.62 | 320.86 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1521/2485) | 60% (1039/1740) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (1121/1521) | 77% (803/1039) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (493/964) | 51% (355/701) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (92/245) | 32% (51/157) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (973/2513) | 36% (634/1769) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (3/3) | 67% (2/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (12/4) | 58% (11/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (21/31) | 59% (13/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 82% (9/11) | 64% (9/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (6/12) | 27% (3/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 76% (25/19) | 73% (15/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 24% (25/6) | 27% (15/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 29% (7/2) |
Zizou Bergs Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
Zizou Bergs
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Juncheng Shang
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Patrick Kypson
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
0
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
67%
(
26 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Zizou Bergs
69%
(
75 of
109)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
105)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
38%
(
41 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 6-7(0) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Calvin Hemery
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Gerald Melzer
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Tabur
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
51%
(
54 of
105)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
42 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Zizou Bergs
49%
(
36 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 1-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Tennys Sandgren Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Tennys Sandgren
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
1-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Tennys Sandgren
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Stefan Kozlov
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Dmitry Popko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Bergs Vs Sandgren Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
